Governor Soludo emerge winner of the recent governorship election in Anambra State, held on November 8, 2025, has sparked intense debate, emotions, and controversies across political and social spheres
Despite the declaration of Governor Charles Soludo’s landslide re-election victory, winning all 21 local government areas of the state, the election outcome remains contentious.
The election, marked by low voter turnout and allegations of vote-buying and result manipulation.
Exposes the deep fractures in the state’s democratic process, casting doubt on the credibility of the results.
Soludo’s Sweeping Victory: Domination or Democracy?
Incumbent Governor Charles Soludo of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) claimed an emphatic victory by surpassing the constitutional requirements.
Winning in every local government area across Anambra.
Such an overwhelming win suggests political dominance but also raises eyebrows over the legitimacy of the process.
Soludo’s main opponents, including Nicholas Ukachukwu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Dr. George Moghalu of the Labour Party.
Challenged his stronghold but failed to make significant inroads.
Several observers are left questioning: how could such a sweeping win occur in a competitive political environment with sixteen candidates?
The answer may lie in the multiple reports of documented vote-buying scandals and alleged collusion with electoral officials that plagued the election cycle.
Vote-Buying Scandals: Democracy for Sale?
The election was tainted by disturbing reports of vote-buying, where voters in some areas, notably Nnewi South, reportedly received up to N15,000 to cast their votes.
Some opposition candidates even alleged offers as high as N100,000 to sway voter behavior.
This statement ignites fierce debate about the ethical decay plaguing the political process and raises serious questions about the integrity of the election.
Such brazen vote-buying reflects a broken system where money often overrides the voice of the people.
Active manipulation and influence erode democracy’s foundations and embed corruption in governance long before winners take office.
Allegations of Result Manipulation: A Plot to Steal Votes?
Adding fuel to the fire, Soludo publicly accused certain political actors of plotting to manipulate the election results during the collation phase.
He alleged attempts to delay the electronic uploading of results by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) officials.
Creating opportunities for result-swapping and tampering.
The governor’s team claimed intelligence suggested that some parties had pre-written results prepared to override actual votes tally.
Soludo insisted his supporters were ready to vigilantly safeguard votes from polling units to state collation centers.
The shadow of manipulation brings the election’s transparency under intense scrutiny.
Low Voter Turnout: Indifference or Disillusionment?
Another striking feature of this election was the very low voter turnout, estimated between 20% and 23%.
Widespread disillusionment, fear of violence, and misinformation campaigns caused many voters to stay away. These factors suppressed participation significantly.
Many voters chose to stay away, signaling a crisis of confidence in the electoral process that challenges the mandate claimed by the winners.
INEC’s Performance and Challenges
While the commission introduced improvements in logistics and electoral monitoring compared to previous polls.
Critics argue that these were not enough to stem the tide of malpractice and political interference.
Soludo’s declaration of the election “going on smoothly” contrasts starkly with the voices of opposition candidates and civil society groups.
Who condemned vote-buying and other irregularities.
Despite security efforts, the election revealed vulnerabilities in Nigeria’s electoral infrastructure and the pressing need for reforms.
Social Media Reaction and Public Outcry
On social media, the election results have sparked heated debates.
Supporters celebrate Soludo’s second term, viewing it as a mandate for continuity and development.
However, critics accuse the incumbent of abusing power.
Pointing to pervasive vote-buying and electoral manipulation as evidence that the election was more about “winners by dollars” than by votes.

