The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) strongly denies that political links motivated its recent declaration of Abdullahi Bashir Haske, Atiku Abubakar’s son-in-law, as wanted.
The anti-corruption agency emphasized that the businessman’s status as the son-in-law of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar played no role in the decision.
EFCC Denies Political Motivations, Cites Serious Charges
In a clear and firm statement, EFCC spokesperson Dele Oyewale firmly rejected all insinuations that politics influenced Haske’s wanted status.
According to Oyewale, the case centers around alleged criminal conspiracy and money laundering, far from any political vendettas or bias.
Oyewale said, “That is rubbish. Haske has been under investigation for years.
He received administrative bail but jumped the process, forcing us to declare him wanted.
Background: Who is Abdullahi Bashir Haske?
Abdullahi Bashir Haske, widely known for his connection to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar through marriage, has been in EFCC’s crosshairs for some time.
The commission has been investigating his financial dealings for several years.
The agency’s highly publicized declaration that he is wanted reignited controversy because of his high-profile family ties.
While some factions of the public and political commentators rushed to suggest that the EFCC’s actions stemmed from political bias against Atiku, the commission rejected these claims as unfounded.
The Real Reason Behind the Wanted Declaration
The EFCC clarified that Haske’s wanted status followed his failure to comply with bail conditions linked to ongoing investigations.
The businessman was on administrative bail but flouted the terms, prompting the agency to release a wanted notice.
When confronted with accusations that the commission was targeting Haske because of his family connections, EFCC maintained these allegations were baseless distractions.
Public Appeal for Information
The EFCC urged anyone with credible information regarding Haske’s whereabouts to come forward immediately.
The public is encouraged to report to the nearest police station or any EFCC office nationwide.
The agency reaffirmed its commitment to following due process and fighting corruption regardless of individual profiles or political considerations.
Controversy Sparks Debate on EFCC’s Credibility
This incident has intensified debates about the EFCC’s impartiality and effectiveness.
Critics argue that the commission often selects cases or acts politically, especially when influential individuals or their relatives get involved.
The EFCC’s firm denial clashes with public skepticism, showcasing public distrust in Nigeria’s anti-corruption institutions.
Such mistrust raises uncomfortable questions about whether authorities apply justice uniformly or enforce it selectively for political ends.
Political Backdrop Fuels Speculation
Atiku Abubakar, long a significant figure in Nigerian politics, has opponents who frequently allege misuse of governmental institutions to target rivals.
Political analysts note that in Nigeria, ruling elites too often use anti-corruption agencies to undermine opposition figures or their families.
Whether justified or not, these perceptions erode the public’s confidence in genuine anti-corruption efforts.
The EFCC’s Stance: Justice Over Politics
EFCC insists its mandate is singular: to combat financial crime and economic sabotage in Nigeria.
The authorities present the specific case against Haske as part of a long-term investigation into financial misconduct, without any shortcut or political agenda.
Dele Oyewale’s blunt remarks highlight the commission’s frustration with what it sees as attempts to politicize a straightforward legal process.
“How can anybody be insinuating that?” he questioned, dismissing political interpretations as deliberate misinformation.
Wahalaupdate’s Perspective: A Call for Transparency and Accountability
For Wahalaupdate, this development underscores the ongoing tension between Nigeria’s political class and anti-corruption institutions.
While people must commend the EFCC for its resolve, maintaining transparency in such high-profile cases is crucial.
Suspicions will persist until clarity is publicly provided on the substance of the allegations, evidence, and procedural fairness.
This event serves as a reminder that anti-corruption campaigns must be above reproach to effectively change Nigeria’s narrative on governance and justice.
