Former National Treasurer of the Labour Party, Oluchi Oparah, has forcefully dismissed recent allegations that former Anambra State Governor and 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, misappropriated party funds during his election campaign.
Speaking on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief on Thursday, Oparah labeled these accusations as baseless and misleading, stressing that Obi funded his campaign entirely from his personal resources.
Allegations of Misuse Stir Controversy
Labour Party chieftain Abayomi Arabambi had publicly claimed that Obi tapped into the party’s treasury to bankroll his presidential bid.
However, Oparah responded emphatically, “There was nothing of such. Mr. Obi never spent any money meant for the party.”
This denial opens a fresh front in the ongoing debate over transparency and accountability within Nigerian political parties.
Highlighting deeper fractures in Labour Party’s internal dynamics.
From Ground Zero to Financial Stability: Obi’s Impact on Labour Party
Oluchi Oparah revealed that before Obi’s entrance, the Labour Party was on the verge of collapse financially.
“The party could not even pay staff salaries,” she said, describing a bleak situation of chronic underfunding and administrative disorder.
She credited Obi with revitalizing the party’s finances.
“He lifted the party from zero level to where it is today,” Oparah stated.
His personal financial support kept the party afloat when no other substantial sources were available.
Obi’s Campaign Finances: Separating Party Funds from Personal Money
According to Oparah, strict protocols govern political campaigns, particularly regarding the segregation of personal campaign funds from party accounts.
“It was standard practice for candidates to operate separate campaign accounts independent of the party’s central accounts,” she clarified.
Obi’s campaign financing followed this norm, with the former governor covering his expenses without drawing on party resources.
In fact, Oparah asserted that Obi not only self-financed but often injected his money to support various party programs.
Especially during the electioneering period, when financial pressures peaked.
Challenging Accusers: Demand for Proof and Transparency
Oparah did not hesitate to confront Obi’s critics directly.
She challenged those making claims of financial impropriety to substantiate their accusations with concrete evidence.
“Anyone claiming whatsoever should come out to show us the particular account to which they paid whatever thing they say they paid to the Labour Party,” she insisted.
Her call for proof underscores the need for accountability while drawing attention to the dangers of political mudslinging that can harm reputations without basis.
Obi’s Commitment Goes Beyond Politics: A Pattern of Generosity
The former treasurer defended Obi’s philanthropic nature, emphasizing that his generosity predates his political career.
“Anyone who knows Mr. Obi very well knows that his act of charity is five and six, like the air he breathes,” Oparah said.
This personal depiction of Obi aims to humanize the politician amid allegations.
Urging Nigerians to judge him on character and contributions rather than political innuendo.
What This Means for Labour Party and Nigerian Politics
The public spat over party finances exposes underlying tensions in the Labour Party, a party that rose from obscurity during Obi’s presidential race.
While Obi is hailed for injecting life and funds into the party, internal disputes and external attacks threaten to undermine that progress.
The controversy also reflects a broader problem in Nigerian politics.
Where accusations of financial impropriety frequently serve as tools for political sabotage rather than constructive critique.
Oparah’s statements raise uncomfortable questions about the sources and use of campaign funds across parties.
Is the Labour Party’s Financial Integrity at Stake
The Labour Party claims financial struggles were severe before Obi’s involvement.
A statement that implicitly questions prior leadership and stewardship.
If true, this raises concerns about the party’s governance capabilities and transparency before Obi’s tenure.
Moreover, such public disputes over funds could diminish public confidence.
Potentially alienating voters who seek trustworthy alternatives to Nigeria’s dominant parties like the APC and PDP.
Personal Heroism or Political Strategy
While Oparah praises Obi’s self-funding as a historic act of sacrifice and loyalty to the party, critics may view it differently.
Some might argue that personalities like Peter Obi concentrating resources perpetuate a culture of reliance on individual wealth rather than institutional strength.
This dynamic complicates the narrative of political parties as collective democratic institutions.
Instead reflecting leadership models built around powerful figures at the center.
The Need for Structural Reform and Transparency
The episode underlines the urgent need for political parties in Nigeria.
Especially newer or smaller ones like Labour, to adopt robust financial management and transparent accounting systems.
Dependence on personal fortunes might propel short-term success but risks organizational instability.
Beyond blame and accusations, implementing independent audits, publishing financial statements, and fostering open governance would rebuild trust with members and the electorate.
Obi’s Financial Legacy Under Scrutiny
Obi’s supporters will laud him as the benefactor who revived Labour’s fortunes from near bankruptcy.
Yet, critics will question the sustainability of a party reliant on a single individual’s wealth and leadership.
Wahalaupdate views this controversy as emblematic of Nigerian politics a battleground where personal ambition, political rivalry, and systemic weaknesses collide.
Obi’s financial legacy should invite reflection on the necessity for transparent, institutionalized campaign financing.
Wahalaupdate will continue monitoring political finance transparency and leadership dynamics within Nigeria’s Labour Party.
2 Comments
serr6o
8tptok